{"id":344,"date":"2024-10-14T00:14:56","date_gmt":"2024-10-14T06:14:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/?p=344"},"modified":"2024-10-14T00:21:47","modified_gmt":"2024-10-14T06:21:47","slug":"percent-deductible-or-a-fraction-of-coverage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/2024\/10\/14\/percent-deductible-or-a-fraction-of-coverage\/","title":{"rendered":"Percent Deductible or a Fraction of Coverage?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The most common case of percent deductibles is in Catastrophe (CAT) property coverage &#8211; carriers mandate a deductible be a percentage of insured value (with a minimum) rather than a flat dollar amount. Yet two options that look the same could be anything but.<\/p>\n<p>A primary difference lies in how or to which figure the percentage is applied. If you have a combined 100M in coverage, with 70M of that building and 30M contents, is your (e.g.) 5% deductible applied to 30M or 100M? That&#8217;s a question with three and a half million dollars of relevance.<\/p>\n<p>Now imagine that same claim happens on a multi-location policy with a 500M limit &#8211; does our deductible then apply to that <em>aggregate<\/em> value? Yikes.<\/p>\n<p>The preferred method is to apply the deductible to only the specific coverage part(s) triggered by the loss . You&#8217;ll often see policies refer to this as a &#8220;per coverage unit&#8221; deductible; the coverage units typically being Building, Contents, and Business Income\/Extra Expense. Doing so means if you have a loss to only (e.g.) Contents and Income you only pay the 5% of the value of those two items. &#8220;Coverage unit&#8221; can be further itemized, such as if you have large amounts of categorized &#8220;Outdoor Property&#8221; or &#8220;Property of Others&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Note this ultimately requires identifying the underlying value of these &#8220;coverage units&#8221;. This is done either via reference to the policy declaration or, more typically, to the Schedule of Value (&#8220;SOV&#8221;) on file with the carrier. Be aware what this means: the <em><strong>itemization on your SOV<\/strong> <\/em>is ultimately what determines your deductible. In other scenarios, this might be a non-issue, but here, lumping values into a single entry or evenly allocating a sum total across locations could obligate you to a much larger deductible than imagined.<\/p>\n<p>Percent deductibles vary not only in the dollar amounts they represent but also in how they are triggered. Because of this they demand scrutiny as well as a good scrubbing of your SOV. Pay close attention to the values on which the percentage is based, and aim to secure one that applies &#8220;per coverage unit&#8221;. Also make sure your SOV is itemized correctly as, after all that, we don&#8217;t want to be left holding the bag because a spreadsheet had 25 lines instead of 26.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The most common case of percent deductibles is in Catastrophe (CAT) property coverage &#8211; carriers mandate a deductible be a percentage of insured value (with a minimum) rather than a flat dollar amount. Yet two options that look the same could be anything but. A primary difference lies in how or to which figure the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/2024\/10\/14\/percent-deductible-or-a-fraction-of-coverage\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Percent Deductible or a Fraction of Coverage?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-344","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-misc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":346,"href":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344\/revisions\/346"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stonepool.com\/insblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}